This is not a list of tips. Here you listen to audio in the test format, answer questions from each section and understand how your score is calculated, before spending money on registration.
Listening~35 min 50 questions
Reading & Grammar65 min 50 questions
Writing45 min 2 parts
Speaking~10 min 5 tasks
by Teacher Brenda · MET Ready — a preparation platform for the MET
The MET has no "pass" or "fail". Each of the four sections receives a score from 0 to 80, and the final score is the simple average of the four.
The detail that changes everything: the average is rounded DOWN
If you score 70, 72, 71 and 73, your average is 71.5, and the certificate says 71. Half a point disappears. That is why raising your weakest section is worth more than polishing your strongest: every point there pulls the whole average up.
Each score band corresponds to a level of the Common European Framework (CEFR), which is what most institutions actually ask for:
Final score
Level
What it means in practice
64 – 80
C1
Proficient user. Usually required for skilled work and university.
53 – 63
B2
Upper intermediate. Accepted by many programs and employers.
40 – 52
B1
Intermediate. Communicates well in familiar situations.
below 40
A2
Basic.
💡 Before studying anything, find out how many points you need. Every institution asks for a different number, and the difference between needing 53 and needing 64 completely changes your study plan. Ask first.
Part 2
Listening~35 minutes · 50 questions · three parts
This is the section where most people lose points without understanding why, because nobody tells them how it really works. Two rules that apply to all three parts:
The audio plays once and does not stop. There is no going back.
The question is also spoken, at the end of the audio. You need to listen to the conversation and the question.
In the examples below you can replay as much as you like, but try to answer after listening once, as in the real test.
Part 1 — short conversations
Two people, three or four turns, one question. It is fast: you have barely understood the topic and the question is already there.
Part 1 samplelisten once and answer below
What happened to the man's wallet?
Answer: D. He says it in the very first line: "I left my wallet at the restaurant last night." The other options use words that are plausible for the topic (bag, police, theft) but never appear in the audio.
See the script (only after answering!)
— I can't believe it. I left my wallet at the restaurant last night. — Really? Did you call them? — Yes. They found it and kept it at the front desk. — That's lucky. You should go pick it up before they close. What happened to the man's wallet?
What we measured in the official materials
In 59% of Part 1 questions, the answer is in the last two lines. If you get lost at the beginning, do not panic: keep listening with extra attention until the end, because that is where the answer usually is.
And beware of the test-prep rule "eliminate the option that repeats words from the audio": we measured it, and it is false on the MET. The correct option repeats as many words from the audio as the wrong ones.
Part 2 — long conversation
A real conversation, with development, and four to five questions about the same audio. Here you can take notes. The first question is almost always about the general idea; the following ones ask for details and intention.
Part 2 sampletwo coworkers · 4 questions on the test, 2 here
1. What are the speakers mainly discussing?
Answer: D. A general-idea question: the right answer covers the whole conversation. Options A and B are topics that really do appear in the audio, but only as part of the conversation, not as its theme. This is the most common MET distractor: something that was said, with its role switched.
2. Why does the man mention his own career change?
Answer: B. He says he traded a stable job for something riskier and calls it "the best decision I ever made". The question is not "what did he say" but why he said it; this type comes up a lot.
Part 3 — lecture or talk
One person speaking: a teacher, a guide, a presenter. It is the densest part, with more academic vocabulary. It also comes in a block of 4 or 5 questions, and you can take notes.
Part 3 samplea professor talking about food labels
1. What is the professor's main argument?
Answer: B. Notice the size of the idea: C is true, but it is only one of the examples she gives, too small to be the central argument. In main-idea questions, the classic mistake is choosing a correct detail.
2. What problem does the professor identify with serving sizes?
Answer: C. She says the serving on the package is usually much smaller than what a person eats in one sitting. A factual detail: the answer is in one specific sentence, which is why note-taking helps so much in this part.
🎧 How to really train: music and TV series help with vocabulary, but they do not train what the MET demands: deciding fast, with the audio playing only once. The training that works is doing questions in the test format, listening once, and then reading the script to find out where you got lost.
Part 3
Reading & Grammar65 minutes · 50 questions · both count as ONE score
This section confuses the most people, because on the score report it appears under a single name, but inside it is two quite different things:
20 Grammar questions: stand-alone sentences with a gap;
30 Reading questions: 2 long texts (5 questions each) + 2 sets of 3 related short texts (10 questions each).
In other words, grammar is worth 40% of your reading score. Anyone who only practices reading comprehension is leaving almost half the section untrained.
The 20 Grammar questions
An everyday sentence, a gap, four very short options. The MET is not testing vocabulary here; it is testing form. Notice that the four options are usually variations of the same word.
The security guard made all visitors ___ their bags before entering the museum.
Answer: C. The verb make (to force) is followed by an object + bare infinitive, without "to": make someone do something. The mistake with "to open" is extremely common among Brazilians, because in Portuguese we say "fez os visitantes abrirem".
___ the librarian recommended was a book about local history.
Answer: D. It is a cleft sentence, an emphasis structure: What + subject + verb + BE. It appears a lot on the test and almost never in a regular English class, which is why it catches so many good students.
What comes up most in Grammar
We measured the 80 grammar questions in the official materials. In order: connectors (however, although, unless…) lead by a wide margin, followed by verb patterns (make/let/allow + verb), gerund vs. infinitive, perfect tenses, comparatives and inversion (Not only… / Rarely…).
Students who took the test recently also report a heavy weight on the third conditional, quantifiers (much/many/few/little) and prepositions in fixed expressions (depend on, responsible for, interested in).
The 30 Reading questions
Half are long texts, magazine-article style, about science, history or behavior. The other half is the part that scares anyone who has never seen it: three short texts on the same subject, in different formats, a notice, a news item, an email, followed by questions that require you to cross-reference the information from all three.
Text A — NEW at Central Library: Borrow More Than Books!
Starting March 1st, Central Library is excited to launch our Library of Things program! With your library card, you can now borrow useful items for FREE.
What's available? We have over 200 items including power drills, sewing machines, musical instruments like guitars and keyboards, camping gear, board games, and gardening tools. Each item can be borrowed for up to two weeks, and most can be renewed if nobody else has reserved them.
Why are we doing this? Many people need these items occasionally but cannot afford to purchase them. Sharing resources builds community connections and reduces waste.
How to borrow: Visit the second floor Information Desk, browse our online catalog, or download our mobile app. All items are free to borrow with a valid library card. Late fees apply after the due date.
What is the main purpose of Text A?
Answer: B. The text announces the program, says what is available, why, and how to borrow. Option A takes a real sentence from the end of the text and turns it into the purpose of the whole text: a true detail in the wrong role.
In paragraph 3, what does "these items" refer to?
Answer: B. This type, what "it", "they", "them" refers to, comes up a lot and scares anyone who has never seen it. The trick is always the same: go back to the sentence before the pronoun and test the option in its place. If the sentence still makes sense, that is the one.
⏱️ The clock: 50 questions in 65 minutes gives you 1 minute and 18 seconds per question, including the time to read the texts. That is why timed practice matters so much: you can know everything and still not finish.
Part 4
Writing45 minutes · two parts · scored by human raters
You write two very different things, and there is a single clock for both: anyone who spends too long on the first part gets tangled up in the second.
Part 1 — short answers
Three personal questions on the same theme. Short answers, one to three sentences each. It looks easy, and it is where many people lose points by answering with a single word.
SAMPLE PROMPT IN THE OFFICIAL FORMAT
1. Who is your best friend, and how did you meet?
2. What do you and your best friend enjoy doing together?
3. When was the last time you saw each other? What did you do?
Notice the design: question 1 in the present, question 2 about a habit, question 3 in the past. That is not a coincidence: the test is checking whether you switch tenses naturally. Answering all three in the present drags the grammar score down.
Part 2 — the essay
A controversial topic with two sides, and you need to give your opinion with reasons and examples. There is no "right" answer; there is a well-built answer.
SAMPLE PROMPT IN THE OFFICIAL FORMAT
Some schools want to include practical skills, such as cooking, first aid, and managing money, in their regular lessons. However, some teachers are hesitant about this idea because there would be less time for traditional subjects. What is your opinion? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The structure that works
Your position, in the first sentence. No warm-up, no "this is a very controversial topic nowadays".
Reason 1 + a concrete example. The example can come from your own life, and it is what separates a good essay from a generic one.
Reason 2 + a concrete example.
Acknowledge the other side and answer it. This paragraph is what raises the score the most: it shows you reason, not just opine.
A short close restating your position.
How Writing is scored — 5 categories, 0 to 4
Task completion (did you answer what was asked?) · Organization and coherence · Grammar · Vocabulary · Mechanics (spelling and punctuation).
Notice that only one of the five is grammar. A text with no mistakes at all, but short, disorganized and not really answering the question, gets a low score. And the opposite is also true: a text with a few slips, but well structured and with real examples, does well.
Part 5
Speaking~10 minutes · 5 tasks · recorded and scored by human raters
You speak to an examiner (or record, in the digital format), and the time for each task is fixed: it starts and ends whether you are speaking or not. Silence is expensive, and speaking until the end is trainable.
One sentence the examiner is required to say, and it is worth gold: "There are no right or wrong answers — say as much as you can." There is no wrong opinion in Speaking. There is an answer that is too short.
Task 1 — describe a picture 60 seconds
You are given a black-and-white drawing of an everyday scene and describe what is happening. The picture below is the same type of scene used in Task 1:
Task 160 seconds
Describe what you see in the picture. Say as much as you can.
01:00
Model answer · 60 seconds
Listen to an answer that fills the whole timesimple vocabulary, no difficult words: that is how you score well
See the text of what was said
This picture shows a factory, or maybe a warehouse, and I'd say it's the part where the products are checked and packed before they leave. In the front, a woman is pressing the buttons on a control panel. She's wearing a helmet, a vest and gloves, so the machine is probably dangerous. On the right, an older man is writing on a clipboard. He might be the supervisor, because he's only checking, while the others do the physical work. In the middle, two men are carrying a big box together. It looks heavy, because they're using both hands and walking slowly. Behind them there's a forklift, but nobody is driving it. I guess they use it for the heavier pallets. On the wall there are tools, so they probably fix the machines themselves. There's also a clock, and it says around ten, so this seems to be the middle of the morning shift. Overall, everyone looks busy but calm, so I'd say this is just a normal working day in a well organized place.
How to fill the 60 seconds without freezing: start with the general picture ("This picture shows a factory where people are working"), then move to the people and what each one is doing (present continuous is the tense of this task), then the objects and where they are, and finish with a deduction: "It looks like they are producing something. They seem to be busy." That last step, deducing, is what separates an average score from a high one.
Tasks 2 to 5 — the other four
All five tasks count toward your Speaking score; there is no warm-up task. So do the same as above: time yourself and answer out loud. Seriously: read the question, press play and speak. Reading the answer in your head prepares nobody.
Task 260 secondspersonal experience · in the past
Tell me about the last time you participated in a school project or competition.
01:00
Model answer · 56 seconds
Listen to an answer that fills the whole timesimple vocabulary, no difficult words: that is how you score well
See the text of what was said
The last time I took part in a school project was about two years ago, at the end of my course. My teacher asked us to work in groups of four, and we had to prepare a presentation about healthy habits. At first, honestly, I was a bit nervous, because I don't really like speaking in front of people. We met three times to organize everything. Two of the girls made the slides, and I was responsible for the part about sleep. I read a few articles, and I remember I practiced at home many times, in front of the mirror. On the day of the presentation, my hands were shaking a lot, and I almost forgot my first sentence. But after the first minute I felt calmer, and then it was actually fine. In the end, our group got a really good grade, and my teacher said our slides were clear and simple. I was proud of myself, because I did something that really scared me, and now I feel more confident when I have to speak.
Task 360 secondsopinion with reasons
Should schools encourage more competitions? Why or why not?
01:00
Model answer · 59 seconds
Listen to an answer that fills the whole timesimple vocabulary, no difficult words: that is how you score well
See the text of what was said
In my opinion, yes, schools should encourage more competitions, but not all the time. I think there are two main reasons for that. First, a competition gives students a clear goal. When you know there's a date and a result, you study harder and you organize your time much better. For example, in my school, the students who joined the science fair learned much more than the ones who only read the book at home. Second, competitions teach you how to deal with pressure. You have to prepare, and you have to perform on a specific day. That's useful for real life too, in a job interview or in an important exam. On the other hand, I understand that too much competition can be stressful, especially for shy students, and some of them start to feel bad about themselves. So I'd say schools should offer competitions regularly, but keep them optional, so nobody feels forced to take part.
Task 490 secondsboth sides
Your friend is moving to a bigger house, and they are considering getting a dog. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a dog?
01:30
Model answer · 82 seconds
Listen to an answer that fills the whole timesimple vocabulary, no difficult words: that is how you score well
See the text of what was said
Well, I think having a dog has good sides and bad sides, so let me talk about both. Starting with the advantages, the first one is company. A dog is always happy to see you, and if your friend lives alone, that makes a big difference in the day. The second advantage is health. When you have a dog, you have to go out and walk every day, even when you don't feel like it, and that's really good exercise. My neighbour is a good example. She started walking her dog twice a day, and after a few months her doctor said her blood pressure was much better. And if your friend has children, a dog also teaches them to take care of somebody else. Now, about the disadvantages. The main one is time. A dog needs attention every single day, and your friend can't just travel for the weekend without planning something first. For example, my cousin had to cancel a trip last year, because she couldn't find anybody to look after her dog. The second problem is money, because you have to pay for food, vaccines and the vet, and sometimes the vet is really expensive. And I should mention the house too. Dogs can break things and make a mess, especially when they're young. So I'd say a dog is wonderful, but only if your friend has enough time and a stable routine.
Task 590 secondsconvince someone
Your city is facing financial difficulties, and to improve the budget the government is considering charging visitors a fee to enter the city's public parks. Many residents think this is unfair and worry it will keep families away. I am the mayor. Tell me what you think about this and try to convince me to agree with you.
01:30
Model answer · 84 seconds
Listen to an answer that fills the whole timesimple vocabulary, no difficult words: that is how you score well
See the text of what was said
I understand the city needs money, and I know it's a difficult situation, but I really believe charging people to enter the parks is not the best solution. My first point is about families. The park is the only free place many families have. If you charge a fee, a mother with three children will simply stop coming, and those children will spend the weekend inside, watching a screen. My second point is about health. Doctors always say people need to walk and be outside, and parks are the cheapest way to keep the population healthy. Let me give you an example. In my neighbourhood, a group of older people meets in the park every morning to walk together. If there's a gate and a fee, most of them will stop going. And if people stop exercising, the city will pay much more later, in hospitals and medicine. There's a third thing too. Our parks are part of the identity of the city. Visitors come here and take pictures, and then they spend money in our restaurants and in our shops. So my suggestion is different. Instead of charging everyone, why not allow small food stands to pay rent inside the park? You could also organize paid events on weekends, like concerts or fairs. That way the city gets the money it needs, and the park stays open and free for everybody.
In Task 5 the examiner plays a role (here, the mayor). Talk to him, not about him: "I understand your concern, but…". And argue with the common good in mind, not just your own preference; that is what the task asks for.
How Speaking is scored — 3 categories, 0 to 4
Task completion · Language resources (grammar and vocabulary) · Intelligibility and delivery (pronunciation, fluency, rhythm).
Notice that accent is not a category. What counts in delivery is being understood, not sounding native. You can have a strong accent and get a high score.
Michigan Language Assessment itself publishes a video of a real candidate doing the Speaking section at C1 level. It is well worth watching before the test; it is the closest thing to seeing the test happen:
Video published by Michigan Language Assessment, the organization that administers the MET.
Part 6
Test day — and what to do afterwards
Before you go in
Bring an official photo ID. Without it, there is no test.
Arrive early. Rushing before the test ruins Listening, which is exactly the part that needs a cool head.
The order of the sections is set by the test center; be ready to start with any of them.
If the score is not what you expected
There are two different paths, and many people confuse them:
Rescore — request a new evaluation
Available only for Writing and Speaking (the sections scored by humans). A new rater reviews your answer. If the score goes up, the fee is refunded. It makes sense when you were 1 or 2 points short of what you need.
Section retake — redo a single section
Available only for Listening, Reading and Writing; there is no Speaking retake. You redo just that section, and best of all: the score cannot go down. If you do worse, the old score stands.
⚠️ Both requests have a short deadline (a few days after the result) and are made directly on the Michigan website. If you think you will need one, decide fast; missing the deadline is the most expensive mistake.
Now that you understand the test
MET Ready is a platform built only for the MET: over 2,400 practice items in the official format, full mock tests, feedback on your writing and speaking on the test's real criteria, and a study plan that adjusts to your level.
Guide produced by Teacher Brenda · MET Ready
The audio, images and questions in this guide are MET Ready's own material, produced in the official test format.
MET and Michigan English Test are trademarks of Michigan Language Assessment. This guide is independent and not affiliated with it. metready.com.br